Pintail Crossing

Tearfully thanked commissioners for visiting the neighborhood and taking safety concerns seriously, and praised neighbors for organizing; said the community will keep working to protect current and future residents.

Argued the duplex plan violates the comprehensive plan's Map 7B, which she said limits the area to single-family detached homes, and said the fight is about rural character, not affordable housing.

Said she moved from Florida to escape high density; worried about traffic past children, pond maintenance burdens, and Ashburn's practice of renting out homes through multiple LLCs.

Cited the developer's own 288-trip figure and warned that with no mailbox shown on the plans, residents will drive through Pintail Point daily for mail; demanded a second Barrett's Chapel entrance and mailbox siting as conditions.

Asked for a 50-foot landscaped buffer with berms or evergreens between the developments to protect privacy from light and noise.

Said her community supports reasonable growth but duplexes don't fit the rural, single-family identity; also flagged buyer confusion between Caesar Rodney and Lake Forest school districts.

As HOA president, listed safety, privacy, EMS strain and property-value worries, and asked that the development not connect to Bufflehead Drive and get a bigger buffer.

Described the site's documented standing-water history and a protected American woodcock at the nearby pond; asked for an independent hydrology study and consolidated retention ponds.

Feared the new development's 25-foot roads with sidewalks will funnel cut-through traffic onto Pintail Point's narrow, sidewalk-less streets, and questioned the 16-20 student estimate.

A volunteer firefighter and HOA board member described strained response capacity — 425 Magnolia runs in 2025, up 21% — and asked the project be cut to 21 single-family homes with no connection to his neighborhood.

Did the math: about 3.5 units per acre versus one per acre next door, plus impervious-surface and Waterfowl/Lexington Mill intersection concerns; asked for a traffic study if connected.

Argued by right zoning can't override the stricter comprehensive plan, that rental conversions defeat affordable homeownership goals, and that the two parcels should be treated as separate applications.

Raised a hand to speak online but couldn't get unmuted; invited to submit written comments by Monday 5 p.m.